Tagged: RF Retitling Non Exclusive
- July 31, 2017 at 2:00 pm #27820kandr21400Participant
Wow….I’m researching, and researching, and researching. There’s a lot to learn. I know a lot of people make their own decisions for whatever reasons. Based on what I’ve been researching, it seems to me that the safest route would be to deal with libraries that are NOT RF, DO NOT do retitling, and are NON-Exclusive. It seems the route that I’m leaning towards. Comments?July 31, 2017 at 4:23 pm #27821Art MunsonKeymaster
it seems to me that the safest route would be to deal with libraries that are NOT RF, DO NOT do retitling, and are NON-Exclusive.
They are all viable ways for income streams. I have tracks in all of the above and exclusive libraries. Re-titling now a days generally means some sort of code appended or pre-pended to an existing title.July 31, 2017 at 5:19 pm #27822ChuckMottParticipant
That would exclude all the libraries i’m in. Including the exclusive ones.August 1, 2017 at 6:38 am #27825BEATSLINGERParticipant
Good morning to ALL. Chuck, I was just thinking the same thing..
I am new at trying my hand on these “RF styled sites” but, by a wide margin my main source of income is coming from the exclusive libraries I am in.August 1, 2017 at 8:59 am #27830CCohnMember
Hi there. Any thoughts on signing Work for Hire agreements losing authorship rights?August 1, 2017 at 9:06 am #27831BEATSLINGERParticipant
To be honest, it really depends on “If you really need the bread, and/or the conditions for the “commissioned works””. I would say make sure you know what you are getting into, and if there is a back-end/residuals or any other payments that will happen for this work.August 1, 2017 at 9:16 am #27832CCohnMember
Makes sense. I wasn’t initially thrilled getting this offer. Will go back and read the fine print.