b1nrybl0ke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How long did it take you to reach 4 figure PRO payments? #40221
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    My first exclusive release was in 1998 and I was hitting 4 figures on less than 10 tracks within 2 years.

    Seems like a lifetime ago.

    in reply to: Music Library Website programmer? #38929
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    No personal experience with Harvest Media, but last I looked they were used by a number of established music libraries in U.K.

    in reply to: Music Library Website programmer? #38871
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant
    in reply to: Do NFTs Matter for Music? #38866
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    I’d not heard about the avatar NFT specifically, but it doesn’t surprise me as it all ties in with the concept of the multiverse era, virtual worlds, and the tokenisation of culture already taking place.

    I’m no expert here but, in terms of minting NFTs – yes, you will need a digital wallet (or several) and some crypto to get you started, but it’s worth noting that the Ethereum blockchain (high gas fees) and OpenSea aren’t the only options. Eg. I’ve recently been minting on https://www.hicetnunc.xyz which uses Tezos coin which, despite an increase in fees, is far cheaper. Cardano blockchain is also one to keep an eye on right now.

    in reply to: Do NFTs Matter for Music? #38860
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    Has anyone delved deeper into potential NFT adoption?

    I think there may be some direct licensing opportunities for composers who can build community around their catalogue. Perhaps by offering limited edition “packages” of tracks which not only have utility through license to use in projects, but also have some type of “unlockable” tradable value. Or perhaps simply offering NFTs as a promotional tool? This could be setup relatively inexpensively in OpenSea, as once you’ve paid the initial store fee you can mint without further cost.

    in reply to: UK Library contracts #35375
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    I was under the impression 5 Alarm Music are US based. https://www.5alarmmusic.com/contact-us/

    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    The point is, I think, one has to be a serial entrepreneur to survive.

    A really useful reminder, Art. Multipotentiality!

    in reply to: Finding PRO tracks in non-PRO music libraries #32444
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    I hadn’t heard that and I have an AdRev account

    It came from a discussion on the AJ forum and seemed to be relating to new accounts rather than existing. I don’t know how legit this is.

    in reply to: Finding PRO tracks in non-PRO music libraries #32435
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    I heard a rumour AdRev aren’t accepting RF composers. Does that only leave Tunesat for anyone looking to move into ContentID?

    in reply to: A cautionary tale #32025
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    Great to see a nice blend of positivity and pragmatism here.

    …that’s the kind of music that will be easy for AI to do first

    “Authenticity” is a word I’ve been seeing bandied about recently in creative circles.

    Keep the faith brother….

    Many thanks, LAWriter and right back at you…

    in reply to: A cautionary tale #32006
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    Thanks chaps. “It’s just a ride” as Mr Hicks said.

    in reply to: Exclusive tracks not registered with PRO #31833
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    They most likely will not register until placed.

    Thanks Art, that seems the most likely explanation in this case. The industry has changed so dramatically over the last few years, it’s difficult to know what’s standard practice anymore.

    in reply to: 15, 30 and 60 second edits #31720
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    I can see how using the mastered audio track will be much quicker

    I think track style might have a bearing. I produce mostly EDM/Pop and for high end work I do the cuts from the original arrangement to avoid long release notes, reverb tails sounding too chopped.

    in reply to: Upfront fees on exclusive album – deal breaker? #31657
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    You raise some really good points, Michael.

    The original album took a while to make a decent return, and the library had some personnel issues which didn’t help. The placements have gathered pace over the last couple of years especially since they partnered with a strong agent in the US, and I felt it could be a good time to try and capitalise on the renewed interest in my music. They’re also pretty good at highlighting the profile of the writers with each release, which I like, and I don’t expect to be making many changes to the tracks once I’m happy with them. I’m a couple of weeks away from completion right now.

    I appreciate what you’re saying about giving the tracks away and hoping for the best, and if this library hadn’t stepped up lately there’s no way I’d be taking another punt. It feels like the right thing to do, it was just the upfront fees that had me wavering.

    in reply to: Upfront fees on exclusive album – deal breaker? #31651
    b1nrybl0ke
    Participant

    Thanks for your input, Michael. The deal will be in perpetuity, and I’m reluctant to take a hit on the license fee share. I’m not sure the reversion clause would be a good fit in this instance given who they are partnered with, or maybe I’m being too negative?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us