Glenn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Exclusive vs. Non-Exclusive Strategy? #30450
    Glenn
    Participant

    Mmmm …. Reality check 2.0 šŸ™

    I did a lot of research the last couple of months and its not getting better unfortunately.

    in reply to: Subscription Survival….. #30449
    Glenn
    Participant

    Things are changing more rapidly as ever. But not always for the bad.

    If I read al this it worries me as a starting library musician. And maybe my pad need some tactic changes. As starting in the non exclusive markets is maybe not a good start anymore? What is the thought of the pro’s about this?

    And how al this subscription models change is affecting the exclusive libraries?

    in reply to: Titling #30431
    Glenn
    Participant

    It was a Tunesat detection.

    I usually come up with the title first so by then I have a good idea of the direction that I am heading. Sometimes things donā€™t always work out that way though.

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Titling #30425
    Glenn
    Participant

    Iā€™ve been making an effort to title my tracks so they are indicative of the musical content or a potential usage. I think it pays off. Hereā€™s a track called Ball Control that is being used on a World Cup promo on the cartoon network. Wondering if others are doing something similar.

    Nice job btw! šŸ™‚

    How you know so fast you cue is used for this clip?

    in reply to: Titling #30424
    Glenn
    Participant

    Interesting!

    I try to do that myself also (for the few tracks I have uploaded) Do you guys have a technique to get the right title?

    How do you translate the cue’s feeling to text?

    I make the cue with a goal in mind. And what I did I played the cue for some people and asked what they heard. When the 2 have resemblance I think i’m on the right track.

    I wonder how you achieve this?

    Thanks,
    Glenn

    Glenn
    Participant

    šŸ™‚

    Glenn
    Participant

    I donā€™t think itā€™s bad. I donā€™t think customers will be put off by it in the royalty free world. If you look at Audiojungle for instance the top selling author there is called Stock Sounds.

    Thanks for your thoughts on this!

    And your totally right about the top seller at audiojungle.

    I can now change it relatively easily because Iā€™m just starting. Better save then sorry ?

    But your post takes away my concern about this. Thanks again.

    Glenn
    Participant

    This has been discussed before. Iā€™d like to think that if your music is good enough for them to make money on, a ā€œprofessionalā€ library wouldnā€™t care about your previous tracks being in a stock music library. Creators have to take advantage of all the different business models to make any money (at least at a certain level) and this should be understood by the ā€œprofessionalsā€.

    Hey Michael,

    Thank you for your answer.

    I think I was not clear enough in my question or you read to fast šŸ˜‰

    It is not if they will accept my music or not. It is about if it is good or bad to use the word stock in my company name.

    Thanks,
    Glenn

    in reply to: Some feedback would be very helpful :-) #30403
    Glenn
    Participant

    Hey Glen I just thought on the cinematic track the open synthā€¦.reminded me of an 80s style synthā€¦.or maybe Iā€™m wrong..with massive or Ominisphere you could blow me away at the beginningā€¦if you take these to an exclusive your gonna need to wow them right out the gateā€¦rise and hit cineMagic effects at the get go ..you could keep those synths and possibly layer themā€¦make it wider and biggerā€¦please understand these are just my observationsā€¦but these are good tracks just trying to help you make them biggerā€¦peace out

    I was thinking and thinking … mmm what is a dated sound in these 2 cue’s.

    But then you mentioned 80’s style synth. And yess there is U-he Diva in it and it is a Jan Hammer kind of Roland sound that you hear there. And it is actually very dated indeed. (Haha) I just love those sounds and they feel timeless for me. But your so right it is a fact and it is actually dated to probably most of us and i get that completely.

    This is a very good question. What sounds not dated and also is still relevant in 5 or 10 years. šŸ™‚

    Thanks cyberk91 that was an eye opener for me and a nice look from another perspective!

    in reply to: Some feedback would be very helpful :-) #30401
    Glenn
    Participant
    in reply to: Some feedback would be very helpful :-) #30400
    Glenn
    Participant

    Hey Glen these tracks were soundcloud for a moment you must have changed your mind.. Your tracks seem to be well thought out and are arranged wellā€¦on the other hand some of your samples seem dated to me ā€¦also when I do transitions I use risers, whitenoise, stutters or such to give warning ā€¦here comes the change ā€¦When I do cinematic stuff I gravitate to Damage by native instruments it has great transistors for cinematic stuff..but this is all personal choiceā€¦.on the second tracks your synth not sure if it was midi or not seemed way to brightā€¦I hope this helpsā€¦keep up the good work!

    Hi Cyberk,

    I think my first post was blocked at first because of the pond5 link. So nothing showed up. So I uploaded the soundcloud versions. Then I guess Art green-light my initial post.

    I really wonder what samples are dated in you opinion? If you can point that out? It will help me a lot šŸ™‚

    I can only agree on the transitions in the cinematic!

    Thank you for taking the time to listen. And yes it is helpful! for sure.

    Glenn

    in reply to: Hi, I'm Glenn from the Netherlands #30345
    Glenn
    Participant

    My start will probably be in the RF library’s to begin with. And then hopefully take the step to the exclusive library’s.

    Not in this business for the fast 6 figures. I’m here to hopefully make some money with the knowledge I have gained over the past 25 years.

    in reply to: What is your blueprint library work that you know? #30343
    Glenn
    Participant

    Thanks beatslinger!

    Maybe my translation was a bit of (english is not my native language)

    It can be a cue of your own but not have to be. There must be cueā€™s that from time to time are talked about in the library world and have a spotlight on it. There are probably 100ā€™s if you are in the game professionally. Cueā€™s that you think of damn I wish I made that one.

    in reply to: What is your blueprint library work that you know? #30337
    Glenn
    Participant

    Listen here: Americana Morning

    That stimulated my imagination! šŸ™‚

    in reply to: What is your blueprint library work that you know? #30336
    Glenn
    Participant

    I would say ā€œAmericana Morningā€ is our best selling both on RF sites and for performances, mainly in commercials.

    Ironically it was probably the quickest track ever written. It took us about 3 hours and was a pitch for a Natureā€™s Valley Granola Bar (which we won). Since then itā€™s appeared in many commercials and currently in an Oxiclean commercial running nationwide.

    That is very nice Art! Curious how it sounds. Will check it out as soon as possible.

    When the flow is there people can rise above themselves.

    Thanks for your example!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us