Happy Ears

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 58 total)
  • Author
    Posts

  • Happy Ears
    Participant

    Make 1.5-2.00 min instrumental edits and use those for libraries then save the full length vocal version for the publishers. In 6-7 years when the vocal versions are starting to sound dated and still haven’t gone anywhere you can add those as well đŸ™‚

    in reply to: Library Communication Issue #24900

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Did you sign any Schedule A/Exhibit A s for the specific cues?

    Did other cues you submitted AFTER these cues already appear in the online library?

    Considering it’s only been since late 2015 and if these was the LATEST cues you submitted and I would chill for a while. It’s very common for a library to go months before updating their catalogs, some of the biggest ones only update their catalogs once or twice a year. I did a group of cues for a big library which I delivered August 2014 but it was just released in April 2016 but they paid me a nice upfront fee for the cues which I got right away so I don’t care.
    I also knew a library who once didn’t update their online library for 1.5 years, they were still distributing via hard drives but even if they didn’t that’s up to them. Sometimes libraries have major programing projects going on or other higher priorities than updating their catalogs which is often the least important aspect of publishing music.

    If the missing cues are NOT the latest cues and you didn’t sign any paper work for those cues and the newer submitted cues appear in their online library and the first letter in the Library name starts with an “S”, I would assume they passed on those cues.
    Then I would just shoot them en email saying something like ” Since those (name the cues) cues are missing from your online library and I didn’t get any Schedule A/ Exhibit A to sign I herby assume you guys passed on those so I’m just letting you know I intend to use them for other purposes. Please advise if this is not the case.

    Just make it real easy for them to reply and stop you if you can’t use them elsewhere.

    Also keep in mind that the person you’re emailing might have been told by the boss to only answer important emails from clients or to do sales or fix registration or only answer emails from composers who generate the library lots of income. This might seem unfair but many of these libraries have only 1-5 people working for them managing 100s of composers and if all of them write emails a few times a month, that might cost the library $5000 extra in salaries to their employes per year just to answer those emails, so always make sure u do anything you can to answer your own question before contacting them.

    If it the same library I think it is, it’s also very important how you formulate your question to them, make sure your email is no longer than a 2-3 line and super clear.

    Just my 2 cents

    in reply to: Everybody NEEDS one… #24769

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Interesting, can you give a ballpark dollar figure on how much it would be to set up a will like that?


    Happy Ears
    Participant

    You do not have permission to view this content.


    Happy Ears
    Participant

    No, I doubt that’s gonna do much for you. This business is realitonship based and beside you can probably dig up that info in that book via the internet using sites like this http://variety411.com/us/los-angeles/ but again I know where Capitol Records are located but doesn’t mean anyone is gonna listen to my stuff just because I drop off my demo at the Capitol Records building.

    in reply to: Licensing direct from your own website??? #24467

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    I can’t get over how amazing it is that Mark Lewis has shared this software for free with us. Hats off to you sir!

    in reply to: what percent would you charge to shop to library? #23565

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    15-20% of writers seems fair, most likely the library would take 100% of the publishing.
    It’s basically a commission based sales deal.
    Your time spent middle managing it between the library and the bands are the investment for which you collect the fee in form of writers share. Of course the possibility of having wasted time on this also comes back to you and your judgement. Not sure how fair the deal would be if you didn’t have to put a little work into it.
    Just do it non exclusive and re-title as a way top say out of other versions of their songs. if they sign a record deal later they can keep their original title for that, the library can pull out the re-title (the audio) and not pitch it further but can still collect from previous placements on cue sheets under the re title

    To have the artists and bands pay you a fee would be a hard sell for music library deals, that’s more of a song plugging deals where they are pitching songs to big artists ex Tim McGraw or Reba and some song writers pay cash fees to be part of regardless of results.

    Don’t worry too much about getting into a exclusive library later, these guys wanna be rock stars and probably don’t care much about not being able to sign with Jingle Punks Exclusive versus Crucial anyway.


    Happy Ears
    Participant

    I wonder how that would work for BMI writers who has co writers with foreign PROs then ? I guess for safety it’s probably best to tell Libraries to make sure they use their BMI entities to collect for a foreign PRO co writer in those cases. I know some libraries default to their ASCAP publishing entities on foreign PRO writers so probably best to request it.

    in reply to: Assigning PRO writer Royalties to your Corporation #22700

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Thank you very much MichaelL and Art for the input, highly appreciated. Seems like Taxes would be the only benefits then. If I find out any more I will post it.

    in reply to: Assigning PRO writer Royalties to your Corporation #22691

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Bump


    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Opps I didn’t see Michael had responded to this already.


    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Keep all emails you sent asking about the issue on file and gather all the evidence you can about them going out of business, ex. taking screen shots of their website or non existent website. Also read your agreement if there is any other company names associated with the agreement if so try contacting them. Keep all this on file. Also shot them an email saying that you will threat this agreement as nullified unless you get a response.
    I’d say 90 days of trying to contact the company with no response should be sufficient time. Then treat the deal like nullified. On the off chance someone would sue you for it, you have reasonably evidence and cause for terminating the agreement. Plus a company who has gone out of business most likely wont spend a bunch of money on suing you for breach of agreement. Don’t fall into a trap where you create a bunch of problems and extremely unlikely scenarios which prevents you to further exploit your music. Also beware of lawyers who use scare tactics to get you to pay for their services. Suing someone is a huge undertaking that most will wanna avoid unless there is a big pay off and those Pawnestar/Kardashian placements aren’t going to be worth it.

    in reply to: Scandinavian Custom Music and Licensing Rates #22104

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Thats really good information Mc_GTR. Thank you so much, I will contact them on monday!

    in reply to: Scandinavian Custom Music and Licensing Rates #22075

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Thanks Veeagra, I appricate your insight!

    in reply to: Scandinavian Custom Music and Licensing Rates #22070

    Happy Ears
    Participant

    Bump

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 58 total)