Forum Replies Created
- January 23, 2020 at 8:36 am in reply to: What´s your opinion on this deal I have been offered? #34108
Sorry dachtyl, my mistake, they offers me 100 % of writers share.
If that is the case, they are offering you a standard deal but you’d have to retitle your work – otherwise, how will the song title revert back to you to collect on anything after 3 years?
I hadn’t thought about this situation. I think then the only solution would be to rename it.
Thank you very much dachtyl for your detailed comments.
I think I’m going to avoid this deal.January 22, 2020 at 2:24 pm in reply to: What´s your opinion on this deal I have been offered? #34100
Thanks again NY Composer.January 22, 2020 at 8:55 am in reply to: What´s your opinion on this deal I have been offered? #34095
NY Composer, they offered me the usual; 50% in syncs, and 50% writers share.
I believe you answered your own question when you mentioned having to lay out cash for WFH agreements
Does that mean you wouldn’t do it?
Thanks NY Composer.October 3, 2019 at 2:29 pm in reply to: Can you get PRO royalties from public domain song covers? #33318
Thank you Paul Biondi. I´ m with ASCAP, perhaps they pay the same.September 28, 2019 at 1:58 pm in reply to: Can you get PRO royalties from public domain song covers? #33301
Thanks Art for your quick response.
Does this apply only to public domain songs?
Thank you Musicmatters and Michael Nickolas, I´ ll take a look to DistroKid.
Thank you very much, Musicmatters and StevenObrien for your helpful comments, I will take them into account to make my decision.
Do you have any recommendations on what strategy to follow when my tracks are of very varied genres? In other words, I don’t have an album as a single musical genre artist. Do you recommend any digital platform where I can upload track by track that are of different genres?
I have used Composer Cloud, for about 3 years, using it only for the months I have needed. For me it has been useful, because I compose in several genres and has and its palette of instruments it offers is wide, although some of the sounds are not the best and you have to tweak almost everything to make it sound good in the mix. Lately I made an upgrade to Composer CloudX, with annual commitment, because it is cheaper $ 19.99 per month, and has an additional microphone position that is really necessary.May 3, 2019 at 12:18 pm in reply to: Do you see any problem signing non-exclusive agreements in perpetuity? #32180
Thank you BEATSLINGER, I just asked for that.May 3, 2019 at 8:39 am in reply to: Do you see any problem signing non-exclusive agreements in perpetuity? #32178
Thank you Paul Biondi. I will consider the things you mentioned.April 29, 2019 at 6:03 pm in reply to: A Non Exclusive Library asking me to include my music in YouTube ID content. #32155
Thank you Art. Great information ¡April 14, 2019 at 10:29 am in reply to: Can I offer the instr. and sung version of a song as excl. to different Librari? #32088
Thanks Art and Advice for your comments,
Paul Biondi, I’ve never tried to do such a detailed thing, but it’s good advice and I’ll try. Thanks.March 20, 2019 at 9:45 am in reply to: What edits do you recommend for an inst.Trailer placed with a NE library? #31906
Thank you BrianMcGrave.March 3, 2019 at 3:02 pm in reply to: How important do you think it is to offer alternate versions in RF libraries? #31800
Got it. Thank you BrianMcGraveyMarch 3, 2019 at 9:35 am in reply to: How important do you think it is to offer alternate versions in RF libraries? #31796
Thanks Art, InLightTone, Kubed and boinkeee2000 for your helpful comments, by the way, can someone explain to me what it is a loop version?