Tbone

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 211 through 215 (of 215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BMI royalties #10520
    Tbone
    Participant

    Do you know how much of that is from overseas royalties?

    Well done by the way!

    in reply to: Ratings by Earnings? #10504
    Tbone
    Participant

    There’s usually a way if you wanted. You could password restrict that area, and you could have people send in their top 3 libraries through a form. Anyway, it was just an idea.

    A really simple thing which might be fun is to have a poll just asking, “which do you make more from: exclusive or non exclusive libraries?”

    in reply to: Ratings by Earnings? #10496
    Tbone
    Participant

    Yea, for me the stories are useful, and so are the numbers. This whole idea for me was about incorporating peoples’ numbers more.

    Don’t mind much either way. Up to Art.

    I’m also keen to avoid what I posted above: “this library’s so great etc etc” but in fact no one’s made anything.

    Lastly, it seems a couple have interpreted this idea as putting ratings on all the library entries and changing the site in a big way. I’m suggesting a small sub section like the polls where those who want to can comment on earnings for libraries. This would take nothing away from you but there are I’m sure others who would find it useful. As you said yourself, YMMV

    in reply to: Ratings by Earnings? #10494
    Tbone
    Participant

    Sure, there’s no need to get rid of all the discussion at all. That’s not what I’m suggesting. This would be a small addition in some place, like the polls.

    The flipside of this coin is that you also get libraries where everyone says how nice they are and how well it’s going, but then you find out that actually no one has made anything from that library. That’s an interesting example too.

    I think there could be some way of incorporating a small section somewhere to do with earnings.

    As a generalized example: if a composer has the same 200 varied tracks, tags and descriptions in libraries A, B and C, wouldn’t it be interesting to see how they do in each one?

    in reply to: Ratings by Earnings? #10490
    Tbone
    Participant

    Number of tracks is a good point, but easy to address: just divide earnings by your total tracks with them.

    Though thinking about it, it might still be interesting to see overall earnings regardless.

    You could make it simpler by just having people name their top three earners… but it’s not so in depth and fun.

    What do you reckon?

Viewing 5 posts - 211 through 215 (of 215 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us