Home » R.I.P. (Graveyard) » RevoStock

RevoStock

No votes yet.
Please wait...
x
Bookmark

If you are a composer and/or songwriter, please leave your comments and experiences with this company. We want to hear the good as well as the bad! Please rate, from 1 to 10, by clicking on one of the stars. Below is some general information but we make no guarantee of accuracy. Check with the company for all details. Please contact us for any corrections.

URL: http://www.revostock.com/
Twitter:
Facebook:
Accepting Submissions: Yes
Submit Online: Yes
Submit By Mail: No
Submissions Reviewed: Yes
Types Accepted: Instrumentals
Charge For Submissions: No
Up Front Money: No
Royalty Free:
(non-broadcast use)
Yes
Exclusivity:
(Exclusive, Non, Semi)

(Semi = Free to place on own
but not with another library)
  • Exclusive
  • Non-Exclusive
Re-Title: Unknown
Set Own Price: No
Contract Length: Unknown
Payment Schedule: Monthly
License Fee Split:
(writer/library)
45/55
PRO Split Based on 100%:
(writer/library
writer/library/publisher
or writer)
100/0
Requires Licensee To File Cue Sheet: Yes
Pays On Blanket License:
YouTube Content ID:
Active Site: No
Offers Subscriptions To Clients:
Notes:

191 thoughts on “RevoStock”

  1. So as they pay Pro royalties, am I right in thinking I should submit my PRS registered tracks as well as my royalty free ?

    Anyone have good success selling SFX files as I am putting a lot up ?

    Reply
  2. I uploaded three tracks for the application, but I can’t see if they are pending or not… I mean, I can’t find the info about the state of my submission anywhere on the site. Could someone please help me?

    Reply
  3. I’ve just told revostock to close my account as i was disgusted to see, as an artist, i only get 45% of sales!!! this is totally unfair and i feel they are scamming people.

    Most other places give a fair 50 / 50 split which is totally fair. Under no circumstances should any site like revostock take more then the artists, its total bs!!

    Anyone thinking of using them for music i would say dont! try pond5 instead, i have more success with pond5 then any other site so far.

    Hope this helps

    Reply
    • Some libraries don’t even give you any of the licensing fees (just PRO royalties). Pump Audio gives 35%, but they also give 50% of the publishing PRO royalties.

      Reply
      • Its partly my own fault, I should have read the garbage before hand but there is so much stuff to read lol … one mistake i wont be making again trust me.

        I will not accept less then 50% and the more people that do the more they are saying it is acceptable to do so, plus they will even try and reduce it further so you get jack!!

        As most artists, we spend much time on our music to be enjoyed by people and theres nothing worse then being abused by these companies. At the end of the day if it was not for our music there site would not have a purpose. Its about time artists stood up and took back whats rightfully theirs!

        next they will be asking for 45% of the copyright lol!

        as more and more people are buying music on the net, record labels are feeling the pressure, anyone now can produce, mix, master, release and distribute their own music
        while having greater control of how it is handled, this make me happy!

        Its up to artists to get a fair deal and not accept second best 🙂

        Peace!

        Reply
    • Oh, you still didn’t discovered Istockaudio. They pay 15% to their nonexclusive artists, and yet they have thousands of them submitting their music every day…

      Reply
  4. One thing I like about this site is that your tracks get alot of traffic, especially if it is editor’s choice. Also, the customer service and statistics are great in my experience. What I like also is that they do not take your publishing rights (or writer’s), so if you sell a track that will be broadcast on TV/Radio, cue sheets are given to the purchaser to submit to the broadcaster (to send to your PRO). Maybe other sites operate this way as well, but I just wanted to share a positive experience. I’ve had 3 sales in about a month out of 20 tracks and sfx. The upfront license fees are not much to speak of but two of the tracks will have cue sheets submitted.

    Reply
    • How do you know two of your tracks will have cue sheets submitted? They don’t give you any info on who purchases your tracks or what they are going to be used for.

      Reply
    • Just to correct my comment for accuracy. These tracks sold at the level 3 license do not necessarily have cue sheets submitted since they may have been used in a DVD or some other wide release according to Revostock. I’ll wait until I see it in ASCAP before I make a comment about it next time:-)

      Reply
  5. I have just been approved to upload my tracks. Have you guys kept the standard “bargain” pricing in there or changed it?

    Reply
  6. Does anyone know how much time does it take usually to have your tracks reviewed by Revostock? I’ve uploaded and submitted about 6 days ago and my tracks are still “Pending”…

    Cheers,
    Michael

    Reply
  7. Can’t get the upload to work with the sites uploader or my own FTP software. Both say to check username password combo. Doesn’t make sense as I’m logged in with my account on Revostock and it says to check my password when trying to upload. Weird.

    Anyone have this problem and figure it out?

    Reply
    • I saw the message on their homepage few days ago about technical problems with uploading tracks.

      As for prices – there are three pricing options for different licenses (user can change it any tme) – 30, 40 and 60usd (maximum prices).

      Also there is a nice feature – viewing most searchable keywords (of course, “wedding” is the first position:-))

      Reply
  8. I agree with Dan and Vincent – i have had approx thirty tracks with them since last june and 10 of them have been downloaded, some more than once for a total of 18 downloads – doesn’t bring in a lot of cash but it is fairly regular – as was mentioned the prices are on the low side but worth doing as its all non exclusive – maybe think about the starbucks approach and have your stuff for sale on every corner?

    Reply
  9. They have recently introduced the option of setting your own price but within certain boundaries – and those boundaries are still on the low side.

    I’ve been with them over a year now and have made a decent amount of money compared to some other royalty free sites – sometimes the volume of sales makes up for the lower price point. I would say if you’ve got tracks non exclusively with other royalty free libraries, why not go with these guys too – it should add something to your income.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

X

Forgot Password?

Join Us