- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by hrih67.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 13, 2015 at 9:32 am #21400Art MunsonKeymaster
Anyone seen this http://www.sourceaudio.com/detect/.
I wonder what they will offer that is different from Tunesat?
April 13, 2015 at 9:34 am #21401Art MunsonKeymasterBump
April 13, 2015 at 10:23 am #21404MichaelLParticipantSeveral of the exclsuive (WFH type) libraries that have my music are in there.
Since this system started up, I’ve been paid for some nearly 20-year old cues that had never seen backend money before….short duration radio uses at that!
April 13, 2015 at 10:49 am #21405Desire_InspiresParticipantHopefully more music libraries will start to implement these services as a way to keep up with royalty payments. That will in turn help composers to make more PRO revenue.
April 13, 2015 at 11:33 am #21406gdomeierParticipantThat would be great. They are loosing money with un-filed cue sheets,right?
Hopefully more music libraries will start to implement these services as a way to keep up with royalty payments. That will in turn help composers to make more PRO revenue.
April 14, 2015 at 9:28 am #21411guscaveGuestI wonder what they will offer that is different from Tunesat?
Tunesat gives you 50 track detection for free. This service only offers a 30 day free trial.
April 14, 2015 at 12:28 pm #21417chuckhughes2ParticipantI pay $28.50/month for Tunesat. I just applied to join sourceaudio because at $29 it’s the same price and I want to see how their detections compare with tunes. It will be a pain to upload all the tracks but I want to see how they compare.
September 18, 2017 at 3:22 am #28242hrih67ParticipantHi all
I’m a newbie at all of this. Joined a few months back – still getting to grips with it all. Just a few songs up on Audiosparx so far but nothing sold as yet!!!
I’m wondering about the usefulness of Tunesat and Audiosource – are they essentially for those of you who administer your own publishing? or is it a useful service even if you administer non-exclusive publishing to a library?
Any thoughts I would really appreciate, thanks
Tony
September 18, 2017 at 5:59 am #28243MusicmattersParticipantIt may be a little soon for you to start with this. I would wait till i have about 50 tracks or so. Very useful though for composers and publishers to keep track of what is actually going on.
September 18, 2017 at 6:00 am #28244MusicmattersParticipantHey guys, how does Sourceaudio compare to Tunesat, Thanks
September 18, 2017 at 9:03 am #28248Art MunsonKeymasterhow does Sourceaudio compare to Tunesat
A bit of a different animal. At SourceAudio you can not only set up your own library but they offer watermarking of your tracks.
The difference is that all of your tracks will need to be watermarked BEFORE submitting to a library or production. Potentially more accurate but if you already have tracks in libraries and on shows, SourceAudio’s watermarking will not help you.
Tunesat creates a digital fingerprint which will help you if you already have tracks released. Potentially not as accurate as watermarking.
September 18, 2017 at 12:24 pm #28256hrih67ParticipantThank you Musicmatters
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.