Home › Forums › Newbie Questions › Just offered my first contact…Unsure about the split
- This topic has 22 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by Art Munson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 19, 2015 at 4:08 am #20226energyflowGuest
Hi guys,
I’m excited to say I’ve been offered my first exclusive contract with a large library in the US!
They emailed me an artist distribution agreement to sign. It all looks good, however there’s a section I’m unsure about. The contract states…
‘Pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 5, the following amounts shall be payable to Artist by Distributor:
(a) Twenty Five percent (25%) of the Gross Receipts in excess of one thousand United States dollars
($1,000.00) per Master listed in Schedule “A” derived from or generated by synchronization licenses granted by
Distributor hereunder.
(b) Ten percent (10%) of the Gross Receipts per Master listed in Schedule “A” derived from or generated
by sales of mechanical downloads (including, but not limited to, Permanent Digital Downloads (“PDD’s”),
“streaming downloads” and “ringtones” as such terms are commonly referred to in the music industry) by
Distributor hereunder.4. The performing rights in the Masters and the compositions contained therein shall be assigned to and licensed by
the public performance societies to which Artist and Distributor belong. These societies shall be and hereby are
authorized to collect and receive all monies earned from the public performance of the Masters and:
(a) to pay one hundred percent (100%) directly to the co-creator(s)/co-composer(s)/co-writer(s) in the
aggregate, of the amount allocated by these societies as the writer’s share of public performance fees for the Masters
and;
(b) to pay one hundred percent (100%) directly to the Distributor, of the amount allocated by these
societies as the publisher’s share of public performance fees for the Masters.’Does this mean I get 25% of sync fees over $1000 and 10% of the master, plus 100% writer share?
If this is the case, is this normal? I assumed these deals were 50/50 all the way. Can someone please clarify?
Thanks in advance for your time.
February 19, 2015 at 4:59 am #20227Rob (Cruciform)GuestYour interpretation looks correct to me. Are they paying you an advance or WFH fee as well? If not, it’s pretty crap (IMO).
February 19, 2015 at 5:11 am #20228Desire_InspiresParticipantIt does seem that you would get 25% of sync fees over $1000. But what if the sync fee is under $1000? You would get nothing?
Plus, you would only get 10% of any mechanical license fee? They would keep 90%?
That sounds a bit unfair.
February 19, 2015 at 5:21 am #20229Rob (Cruciform)GuestActually, I spoke to hastily based on skim reading and too many inferences from not enough information. There are a lot of ‘depends’ here. Are they paying for mixing and mastering? Are they covering session musos?
Also, it’s not “10% of the Masters”, but 10% of gross receipts per master.
February 19, 2015 at 5:21 am #20230TrackmasterGuestJeez. These libraries are really trying to screw over composers.
We should get AT LEAST 50% of everything if there is no upfront pay involved. This is just disgusting, honestly.
February 19, 2015 at 7:04 am #20233MuscoSoundParticipantI don’t know all the details here but it sounds a little unfair from what was posted here. So basically they keep just about everything from 0-1000 on the sync, and then if it’s over 1000 you only get 25%. I would say no thanks unless they are paying something upfront for your music and are placing a lot of music that will generate back end money. I don’t like the idea of getting zero commission for anything under $1000, you should get a cut of that regardless, and a lot more then 25%.
February 19, 2015 at 7:09 am #20234energyflowGuestThanks for all of your responses. In answer to your questions…
Nope, they’re not paying any advances or WFH fees.
And they’re not paying for mixing, mastering or session musos.
After reading your responses, I don’t feel so excited anymore. Are these deals negotiable?
February 19, 2015 at 7:18 am #20236Desire_InspiresParticipantAre these deals negotiable?
Sure. Ask for what you think is fair. Be polite but firm. If they reject, don’t sign the deal. There is no reason to sign a deal that you are uncomfortable with.
February 19, 2015 at 7:21 am #20237TboneParticipantNever thought I’d say this a few years back but DI is right on the money. That’s excellent advice.
And also, all these deals are negotiable – it’s not a US hostage situation, it’s just a library of WAV files.
Good luck and let us know what happens. I would ask for a) the terms I want and think are reasonable and b) more clarity in the contract wording.
February 19, 2015 at 7:23 am #20238Desire_InspiresParticipantNever thought I’d say this a few years back but DI is right on the money. That’s excellent advice.
Ha ha ha. Me either! I guess I am learning.
February 19, 2015 at 7:33 am #20239SoundscapeParticipantWhat about copyright? Are they taking it in perpetuity? Reversion clause? Or is it only an exclusive representation during the term? How long is the term?
All important things to think about.February 19, 2015 at 9:10 am #20241energyflowGuestThank you all so much for your words of wisdom.
You’re right Tbone, it’s not a hostage situation. I will negotiate for a fairer deal and I’ll let you know the outcome.
Thanks again.
February 19, 2015 at 6:51 pm #20257Steve BallardGuestFebruary 19, 2015 at 6:52 pm #20258Steve BallardGuestFebruary 19, 2015 at 6:57 pm #20259Desire_InspiresParticipantOuch.
Leave this company alone.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.