- This topic has 23 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by .
-
Posts
-
Yeah it sucks – then the next question is, when are you getting your share of that income? And shouldn’t you get all of it?
I had a non-ex library that I’ve done really well with, literally do this at least four times with the SAME music… the first time I’d find out would be from a RF library freaking out, telling me they have to refund sales to some of their customers. After the first time it was always a mistake – non-ex music bundled in with exclusive music and sent over to AdRev, then uploaded into Source Audio, then removed, then put in again… it was all worth the stress and hassle though because this particular library has netted me much more than all RF libraries have combined.
These days I seem to just get the mistaken or fraudulent matches – illegal ‘remixes’ of my tracks (bought from a RF site) that are enrolled in Content ID, stuff like that.
Hello,
If you have your music already uploaded to a Content ID Provider, and a non-exclusive library tries to upload that same music to a Content ID Provider, what will happen?
Will it get blocked by YouTube or will there be a conflict?
I posted recently in another thread about having this exact same problem. I started a YouTube channel to promote some RF tracks and link to my P5 page. Eight out of the first ten I uploaded came back being monetized by two different NE libraries. And like Mark says, multiple offenders. I had been told by both in the past my tracks had been removed. I’m sure, like Art has found, that many others of mine are still improperly (illegally?) in the system. I mentioned in my previous post that what bothers me is the companies doing this are putting me in breach of contracts I’ve signed with NE libraries stating I would not have my music in the content ID system. I agree it is very much so getting out of hand.
By the way, during all this I learned from adrev that there is no way for them to remove tracks from YouTube’s content ID. They have a process in place of deactivating reference files so content ID won’t be able to make any matches but tracks are not technically removed from content ID by adrev.
So there are non-exclusive libraries that specifically make a contractual agreement that they don’t accept ContentID music even if it is handled by the owner of the copyright?
Also, when searching through the Access Libraries I select “Yes” under “YouTube ContentID”
Does this mean, from a non-exclusive Stand Point :
A. Yes, This library Accepts Music that has Content ID (Handled by the Author)
or
B. Yes, This library Registers your music Under a Content ID provider for you
?
Perfect, thank you!
Right, before submitting I will notify them of my situation and see if they will accept my music even tho I handle the content ID.
All the best!
I have a question: I too want to avoid stuff going onto YouTube content ID. On songtradr with its monetisation you can tick to be with Big Sync Music amongst other people. What’s not clear from them and many other libraries is whether your tracks will end up with content ID on YouTube. What I don’t want is people buying my tracks legitimately from elsewhere and finding they can’t use them.
Does anyone have any experience of this on Songtradr?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.