Michael Nickolas

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 520 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ESPN Cue Sheets #31838
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    It is disappointing. Between direct licensing and the dreaded survey it’s surprising we get any pay at all sometimes.

    in reply to: ESPN Cue Sheets #31830
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Is ESPN not paying royalties because like the Scripps networks all of the music for their shows is direct licensed? Or is it because ASCAP doesn’t survey the network? Maybe your next question about the new cue sheets should be to ASCAP.

    in reply to: Best paying network? #31785
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    It’s kind of hard to compare cable networks. Payouts depend on time of day of the broadcast – morning, afternoon, prime-time or night. Of course there’s the length of the cue, the number of plays and the type of performance as in background, background vocal, feature, etc. Just looking at the statement for the highest dollar amount doesn’t really tell the whole story…

    in reply to: PROs that let you decide which tracks you register with them? #31784
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    ASCAP certainly lets you decide which tracks to register. But I was curious about your post and took a quick look on the TEOSTO website and saw this:

    “Teosto’s membership agreement for music authors covers all the compositions, lyrics and arrangements of an author. However, Teosto wants to increase music authors’ freedom of choice through self-administration. In practice, this means that authors can administer the rights to their works themselves in some cases.

    Game music is one of the areas subject to music authors’ self-administration.”

    in reply to: Nat Geo Royalties? #31743
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    My January ASCAP statement had 16 Nat Geo placements. Average payout for :15 seconds is like .45 cents.

    in reply to: Critique/feedback/advice #31721
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Well, it certainly isn’t stock production music. 🙂 Concentrate on libraries that place their primary focus more on indie artists than jack of all trades composers. And as an artist, you’ll want to pay attention to how you’d be allowed to use your music should you enter an exclusive deal. Can you place it with streaming services, sell at gigs or etc.

    in reply to: Composing for indie projects – How much to charge? #31715
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    I added some music, but didnt’ really know where to go with it so i just used a whole CD that I had

    Well, you shouldn’t be using a whole CD that you had without obtaining the proper licenses. So it’s good you are looking into replacing the music. I watched a few minutes and feel you don’t need a custom score. Purchasing licenses for stock music I think will make you legal and do a fine job. The $500 you have could purchase around ten licenses I estimate. I have a few in that style:
    https://www.pond5.com/collections/2303691

    in reply to: 15, 30 and 60 second edits #31714
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    I always end up with horrible clicks and pops after I start chopping up audio.

    Set your audio editor to snap to zero crossing, this will avoid the clicks and pops. There will be times you’ll need to turn this snap off to make a very exact timing cut, but 90% of the time it will be better on.

    in reply to: Facebook / Instagram Building Catalog of Music #31706
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    I’m putting up a more simple thought. Any opportunity that tells me “This is potentially good exposure” as it does at the distrokid link makes me sure NOT to partake. I’ve been hearing the dreaded “E” word since I first started in the music business playing in bands, and all it’s ever meant is someone gains and I lose.

    in reply to: Upfront fees on exclusive album – deal breaker? #31655
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Hi, I tried to reply but it’s not showing up here. Drop me a PM or I’ll try to post again later.

    in reply to: Upfront fees on exclusive album – deal breaker? #31644
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Sure, push for an upfront fee. They might take away the 50% of license fees though. I would say consider no upfront fee a deal breaker if the deal is in perpetuity. If you can get a reversion clause where the tracks revert back to you after a few years if no placements you might give it more consideration.

    in reply to: Report subscription sites #31520
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    You do not have permission to view this content.

    in reply to: Starting out and first uploads #31511
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Thanks boinkeee, I just started with SonicScoop but have been a contributor to “Recording Magazine” since 1995!

    in reply to: Starting out and first uploads #31506
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    You’re welcome!

    in reply to: Starting out and first uploads #31504
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    I’m sure some of the vets on here have known this for a while. But wow, any hitch in workflow or organization can completely ruin a day of music.

    Funny, I just published an article on that:

    https://sonicscoop.com/2018/12/17/recording-songwriters-5-tips-for-improving-your-workflow-in-the-studio/

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 520 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us