Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 3, 2019 at 8:39 am in reply to: Do you see any problem signing non-exclusive agreements in perpetuity? #32178WaldenParticipant
Thank you Paul Biondi. I will consider the things you mentioned.
April 29, 2019 at 6:03 pm in reply to: A Non Exclusive Library asking me to include my music in YouTube ID content. #32155WaldenParticipantThank you Art. Great information ¡
April 14, 2019 at 10:29 am in reply to: Can I offer the instr. and sung version of a song as excl. to different Librari? #32088WaldenParticipantThanks Art and Advice for your comments,
Paul Biondi, I’ve never tried to do such a detailed thing, but it’s good advice and I’ll try. Thanks.March 20, 2019 at 9:45 am in reply to: What edits do you recommend for an inst.Trailer placed with a NE library? #31906WaldenParticipantThank you BrianMcGrave.
March 3, 2019 at 3:02 pm in reply to: How important do you think it is to offer alternate versions in RF libraries? #31800WaldenParticipantGot it. Thank you BrianMcGravey
March 3, 2019 at 9:35 am in reply to: How important do you think it is to offer alternate versions in RF libraries? #31796WaldenParticipantThanks Art, InLightTone, Kubed and boinkeee2000 for your helpful comments, by the way, can someone explain to me what it is a loop version?
Thank you.
January 23, 2019 at 3:08 pm in reply to: Should I rename my songs for each Non-Exc and RF library where I place my Music? #31557WaldenParticipantThanks MichaelL, your comments are very useful for the decisions I am making.
January 23, 2019 at 10:05 am in reply to: Should I rename my songs for each Non-Exc and RF library where I place my Music? #31555WaldenParticipantMichaelL, I mean Non-Exc libraries that that reports to PRO´S. In your opinion, there’s no problem with putting that same music on RF sites?
January 22, 2019 at 12:58 pm in reply to: Should I rename my songs for each Non-Exc and RF library where I place my Music? #31553WaldenParticipantIn your experience, is there a problem with using the same music in traditional libraries, and RF sites? Or do you consider that they are different markets and that they should not be mixed? That is, your music for traditional libraries should remain in that market ?, and what is advisable is to compose music especially for the RF stock market? My concern is that maybe I would be devaluing the music that I have in traditional libraries
Do you recommend using a pseudonym in the RF market?Thanks for your comments.
January 20, 2019 at 5:47 pm in reply to: Should I rename my songs for each Non-Exc and RF library where I place my Music? #31543WaldenParticipantOk. thanks Art.
January 16, 2019 at 2:41 pm in reply to: Should I rename my songs for each Non-Exc and RF library where I place my Music? #31516WaldenParticipantArt, why did you decide to stop doing it?
November 28, 2018 at 6:25 pm in reply to: No sync license. Exclusive and in perp, only PRO. Would you sign it? #31317WaldenParticipantI agree with you guys, I think signing an agreement like that devalues us all. Probably the track is not a masterpiece, but it is a professional track. What struck me is that the owner of the library told me that all the composers were signing with him with those conditions. I do not understand why they do not want to share the synchronization licenses? What logic is behind this? It does not seem fair to me. That’s why I put this post here, to know if there is someone who has had a positive experience with this type of contract.
BEATSLINGER,boinkeee2000, Tbone, I appreciate your comments very much,I will follow the advice of Music 1234, and if things continue the same, I will reject the offer.November 28, 2018 at 9:27 am in reply to: No sync license. Exclusive and in perp, only PRO. Would you sign it? #31313WaldenParticipantThank you BEATSLINGER for your helpful comments.
For what I see is a small company, led by a well-known musician, look for information from them, but I did not find much. They tell me they are supplying music to important TV channels. It’s all the information I have. -
AuthorPosts