[woodsdenis]

The users this is available to are the ones who already used music that wasn’t allowed, i.e., they were never going to pay for music anyway. They can’t monetize their video so you get all the ad revenue. If you’re lucky that could be in the thousands. Most likely less.

Surely this is available to anyone who wants to use music, not just ones who are “caught”. The caveat is you lose the right to monetise the vid. That is taken by AdRev and the composer. So say I had a video and I didn’t care about an ad on it I would use this to get music for no synch fee rather than paying the synch fee to the library.

[woodsdenis]

Aren’t SM physically modelled , no actual samples ?

[woodsdenis]

Hi,well they follow the adrev.net system but in youtube, so you still gain money for the synch music used from you, so its not free, is like you let youtube license it for you or help you put it on users reach, you gain money with this too.

Hi, how much do YT charge for the sync fee? My understanding is nothing, so for the YT user they get the music for free. What am I missing here ? Of course the composer makes their share from the AdRev side.

[woodsdenis]

I don’t own Albion but I don’t think it has a “dated” sound. I think that the newer libraries from Spitfire offer greater individual depth . This is at a cost from a monetary/CPU/RAM standpoint. Albion was there first library , I think , it was sort of marketed as a “cheaper” Symphobia from a new developer. It may be reduced but is hardly cheap. Loads of vids on YT showing it off.

[woodsdenis]

I am guessing its just marketing, probably little or no sales at this point for it, so sell it off a greatly reduced rate. I do agree this is a first for a sample library.

[woodsdenis]

Really nice Adi tx

[woodsdenis]

Indiginus do a really good slide guitar

[woodsdenis]

Back up now

[woodsdenis]

This is why putting it front of jury scares me. IMO Twelve average people are not the best method of discerning the nuances of copyright law.

Generally a “beat,” that is not a sampled recording, is beyond the purview of copyright protection because it’s too generic. The chances that Zimba Ku were the absolute originators of this beat are minimal. But, whether or not a jury will be able to grasp why that matters is another question.

I totally agree, another angle on the case is that maybe the “sampled” usage was actually licensed from the record company and legit whereas this case is about composition and a very big record. Where theres a hit theres a writ, as they say.

[woodsdenis]

This particular case is about the actual beat, the plaintiffs do not own the sound recording. Ironically the actual sample has been used many times on hip hop tracks.

[woodsdenis]

court docs

[woodsdenis]

Melda have a free bundle.

[woodsdenis]

Free. Voxenengo Span and Audio Damage have a great OTT compressor. Soundtoys have amazing free giveaways.

[woodsdenis]

Audiodeluxe is a great site for sales and offers on most plugins. Probably MotuNation is your best bet for the answer Edouardo.

[woodsdenis]

Complicated topic and as usual and tx MichaelL fro words of wisdom. I think DI means well but has a compulsion to post on every subject without necessarily knowing the answer. With all matters legal tread very carefully and take advice wisely. There is so much misinformation floating about the internet its frightening.

[Author]

Posts