Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
AlanParticipant
So I take it, Art, that you have State51 Conspiracy content on YouTube too.
Yep, I looked them up online and sent them (state51 Conspiracy) an e-mail to remove.
Do you have the right to request removal if you checked the “External Distribution” block and the library has an agreement with State51 Conspiracy?
Please share the outcome of your request.AlanParticipantI forgot yo mention this was also on the YouTube video
“Provided to YouTube by The state51 Conspiracy”AlanParticipantAnd if you have a free account with tunesat, those promos can max out your 50 detections per month in a few days. I had a non-paying promo run every15 minutes for three months. It cost me all my tunesat detections.
I guess you get what you pay for ๐AlanParticipantBump
AlanParticipantBut Chuck, how do you know if don’t try. It took me 3 years of blind submissions to find the RF library that has become my best money maker by far.
Yes, like most I have invested many hours uploading and tagging tracks to libraries that have sold nothing and even gone out of business. There are many more that only sell a handful of tracks or TV placements a year. I stopped submitting to most of those, but I continue to submit new tracks to the ones that have the potential for an occasional decent payout. I think of them as my “scratch off lottery tickets” and they contribute to my bottom line.I do not search out new libraries to submit to anymore unless there is a great deal if positive chatter on MLR.
Question:
Have you done everything you can to streamline youer submission process to it is fast and efficient? I go through a process after I finish a track that includes making alt. mixes and a word doc that has all the info I could ever need for that track including tags, tempo, instruments etc. This makes submissions much faster because I just copy/paste needed info.AlanParticipantBump
AlanParticipantMy experience was very similar Chuck. I had exponential growth for my 1st 5 years or so. I’m starting to show signs of leveling off now (into my 7th year). However, I am now getting 1-3 large sync fees per year. That combined with a larger library still has me at 10%-20% annual growth. I expect that will end soon though.
Search out my post “5 year report” I did a couple of years ago if you haven’t seen it.AlanParticipantOk, ok, I’m still a rookie voicing my dreams.
By “best’ composers, I was more along the lines of “Hey, you have used a ton of Art Munson’s stuff in past seasons and he has lots of new stuff. He is just hesitant to give it to us exclusively because he loses the RF market …”
AlanParticipantNo apologies needed Vlad.
The only thing I disagree with is that the composers are the ones holding all of the cards. We just don’t play our hands very well. ๐What I envision is this conversation:
A&R rep for the “Score-Mib-Epito-Punks” Music Library speaking to HIST-TLC-NatGeo producers:
“…Yes, I sent out another music request for exclusive retro-pop-urban-redneck-EDM tracks to all my best composers. The response was not very good because the back end is so low and they don’t want to loose the RF income potential. Would you consider letting them submit tracks to a short list of RF sites like “Pond-Fruit-Loops” that cater to independent video production houses, not TV? We could easily put it in our contract. This would insure you don’t get duplicate tracks from other libraries, plus the composers will send us more material……”
Maybe I’m naive, but this seems like a win-win compromise to the non-exclusive problems. I figure, if a library can keep list of competitors we ARE NOT allowed to sell through, they could just as easily make a list of libraries we ARE allowed to sell though.
The only problem I see is finding a publisher who gave a sh!# about us and was willing to go out on a limb and risk rocking the boat. Who was the first library to try non-exclusive?
AlanParticipantI forgot to follow up on this thread. I cloned my OS and audio drives with no issues at all. Everything went smoothly and my rig is much faster now. Thanks again for the input.
AlanParticipantSame experience here. Less than 25 and $0 but at least I feel certain they will earn some RF dollars once I get them up. I do make a lot more on back end than RF though.
Art, you still haven’t posted them on the RF sites? Ha, that’s funny. I dragged my feet too. The tagging, argh. I still haven’t gotten all 25 done. Many need some tweaking now that I have a few more years of experience.
AlanParticipant@Jerry
Unfortunately, I’m not good enough to get in to the “major” exclusive libraries … yet. Maybe somedayAlanParticipantI recently had 25 tracks released from an exclusive library (actually converted to non-Ex). They earned me less than $200 in back end an no sync fees in five years.
I put them in a couple of RF libraries a few months ago and they immediately started selling and have already surpassed the exclusive income I made with them.I still do some exclusive stuff if I get a call for music that is “in my wheelhouse” and I can knock it out quickly. I hope to do a “heavy” time intensive track or 2 this year and submit it exclusively to see how it does.
I still have never gotten a sync fee for an exclusive track, just cable network back end. Most of my placements are still non-ex, but that takes time to see results.
I still make more from RF that back end so non-ex it my preference.
AlanParticipantPlease don’t delete it Art. I wrote three awesome tracks in the time it took Mr. Baker to write that, ๐
Honestly, it was an enjoyable read Mr Baker. English major?
CheersAlanParticipantI have dozens of those Jay. One is even listed in both Series and Non-Series. I’m waiting to get double the royalties for them, but it hasn’t happened yet. ๐
I assume its just a clerical error. There’s no shortage of thos with ASCAP -
AuthorPosts