Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2022 at 1:52 am in reply to: How long did it take you to reach 4 figure PRO payments? #40221b1nrybl0keParticipant
My first exclusive release was in 1998 and I was hitting 4 figures on less than 10 tracks within 2 years.
Seems like a lifetime ago.
b1nrybl0keParticipantNo personal experience with Harvest Media, but last I looked they were used by a number of established music libraries in U.K.
b1nrybl0keParticipantb1nrybl0keParticipantI’d not heard about the avatar NFT specifically, but it doesn’t surprise me as it all ties in with the concept of the multiverse era, virtual worlds, and the tokenisation of culture already taking place.
I’m no expert here but, in terms of minting NFTs – yes, you will need a digital wallet (or several) and some crypto to get you started, but it’s worth noting that the Ethereum blockchain (high gas fees) and OpenSea aren’t the only options. Eg. I’ve recently been minting on https://www.hicetnunc.xyz which uses Tezos coin which, despite an increase in fees, is far cheaper. Cardano blockchain is also one to keep an eye on right now.
b1nrybl0keParticipantHas anyone delved deeper into potential NFT adoption?
I think there may be some direct licensing opportunities for composers who can build community around their catalogue. Perhaps by offering limited edition “packages” of tracks which not only have utility through license to use in projects, but also have some type of “unlockable” tradable value. Or perhaps simply offering NFTs as a promotional tool? This could be setup relatively inexpensively in OpenSea, as once you’ve paid the initial store fee you can mint without further cost.
b1nrybl0keParticipantI was under the impression 5 Alarm Music are US based. https://www.5alarmmusic.com/contact-us/
August 15, 2019 at 3:19 am in reply to: Paranoid venture capitalists in the stock music business are at it again #32867b1nrybl0keParticipantThe point is, I think, one has to be a serial entrepreneur to survive.
A really useful reminder, Art. Multipotentiality!
b1nrybl0keParticipantI hadn’t heard that and I have an AdRev account
It came from a discussion on the AJ forum and seemed to be relating to new accounts rather than existing. I don’t know how legit this is.
b1nrybl0keParticipantI heard a rumour AdRev aren’t accepting RF composers. Does that only leave Tunesat for anyone looking to move into ContentID?
b1nrybl0keParticipantGreat to see a nice blend of positivity and pragmatism here.
…that’s the kind of music that will be easy for AI to do first
“Authenticity” is a word I’ve been seeing bandied about recently in creative circles.
Keep the faith brother….
Many thanks, LAWriter and right back at you…
b1nrybl0keParticipantThanks chaps. “It’s just a ride” as Mr Hicks said.
b1nrybl0keParticipantThey most likely will not register until placed.
Thanks Art, that seems the most likely explanation in this case. The industry has changed so dramatically over the last few years, it’s difficult to know what’s standard practice anymore.
b1nrybl0keParticipantI can see how using the mastered audio track will be much quicker
I think track style might have a bearing. I produce mostly EDM/Pop and for high end work I do the cuts from the original arrangement to avoid long release notes, reverb tails sounding too chopped.
b1nrybl0keParticipantYou raise some really good points, Michael.
The original album took a while to make a decent return, and the library had some personnel issues which didn’t help. The placements have gathered pace over the last couple of years especially since they partnered with a strong agent in the US, and I felt it could be a good time to try and capitalise on the renewed interest in my music. They’re also pretty good at highlighting the profile of the writers with each release, which I like, and I don’t expect to be making many changes to the tracks once I’m happy with them. I’m a couple of weeks away from completion right now.
I appreciate what you’re saying about giving the tracks away and hoping for the best, and if this library hadn’t stepped up lately there’s no way I’d be taking another punt. It feels like the right thing to do, it was just the upfront fees that had me wavering.
b1nrybl0keParticipantThanks for your input, Michael. The deal will be in perpetuity, and I’m reluctant to take a hit on the license fee share. I’m not sure the reversion clause would be a good fit in this instance given who they are partnered with, or maybe I’m being too negative?
-
AuthorPosts