Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
bradymusicoParticipant
3 cues a day is nothing for me and I don’t even do this full time.
So, in other words, DI – you STILL don’t get it! :p
bradymusicoParticipantI’ve seen the opposite from JP. Since going exclusive with them last year, I’ve had a sharp increase in uses for promos etc. I think it’s hard to say what’s really working. I wish there were some more specific analytics available in the J Player. Would be interesting to compare plays with NE tracks vs E…I suspect it’s not an accident that they never brought back the analytics though. 🙁
bradymusicoParticipantFor me, my better paying Broadcast placements of 2013 were mostly from Exclusive cues. I’m curious if others saw that happen with their portfolios as well…? Overall, exclusive tracks have also performed better for me but I was somewhat late to the game as far as NE library work, so I’m not that great of an example in terms of the trend.
bradymusicoParticipantFunny Art – I was just going to send this….
bradymusicoParticipantThe backend may be only a few dollars (or even cents). When busy people get chased for $5 they don’t like it, and it makes you look desperate.
I’m with MichaelL on this. Contacting the producers (or a library!) this soon after a placement airs is an amateur move and not how you want to come across to anyone. This is a business of patience and moving on to the next cue! Sure, make sure you log the info and continue to monitor the usage so that if you aren’t paid many months down the road you can follow-up but I definitely would not try and contact someone right away. Congrats on the spot.
May 3, 2014 at 8:25 am in reply to: Contracts and schedule's….Is electronic signature sufficient? #16131bradymusicoParticipantFor the last year and a half, I have signed almost every contract/schedule I’ve received with an app called Docusign. It’s a wonderful app I highly recommend. In my experience, libraries don’t care as long as it looks like a signature (not using an auto generated nice cursive looking sig). With docusign you can draw in your own sig and save it so that when you go to sign a contract you just tap the area and you are good to go! – B
bradymusicoParticipantI’m in the same boat. I have almost 100 detections on Tunesat this month for a placement on GAC-not sure from which library. Anybody know anything about this network?
I have had a bunch on GAC this last month also. Since it is also a Scripps baby, don’t hold your breath! – B
bradymusicoParticipantPlus: in this age of “give us your music for free, exclusively, for no money up front” …I would ask the question, “how far does exclusive go?” Maybe it’s just the lawyer in me, but I wouldn’t extend it to new works from old works.
+1 on that! I have done this frequently on exclusive deals. Particularly when it’s a good cue that gets traction somewhere. I do spend time making it different in some unique ways ( I think that’s important if you go that route). I wouldn’t personally do this for anything you are paid for upfront by a high end lib (but even then depends on how much the cue is altered, I think!) I’ve only done this in the lower end blanket libs…
bradymusicoParticipantI’m in eight exclusive (WFH) libraries. I did not ask them to move cues from ASCAP to BMI. Yes, ASCAP still pays for those cues.
So in this case do you still have the normal online membership access where you can see new cue sheets etc?
Like I said…not everyone gets into SESAC.
Best of luck wherever you land!
Thank you! – B
bradymusicoParticipantThanks for the info MichaelL and Art!
@MichaelL – I am going through the interview process right now, so have not been offered affiliation yet… My termination date with ASCAP is not until April of next year and I would need to put in my notice in October. So if I am not going to SESAC I will be going to BMI and doing similar to what you have done Michael.One question… So with library tracks that you are not the publisher, for example, ASCAP still pays you for the writer’s share because you have left those with them due to the interested parties? Did you contact any libraries to have certain tracks moved over to BMI…? It would be kind of a bummer to leave some of the cues there (with ASCAP) when I want the tracking to improve on future usage.
Thanks again MichaelL! Very helpful 🙂
bradymusicoParticipantI know of one very successful composer (with a very large catalog) who made the switch from ASCAP to SESAC. He’s very happy and his wallet is fatter because of it.
Well, that’s good news. Thanks Art!
bradymusicoParticipantInteresting idea! Seems like they would need to get some big names on board, in order for this to get any real traction/attention. But, then again…who knows!?
bradymusicoParticipantThe trick is to use the most transparent limiter you can, my go to is the Fabfilter pro L. It is outstanding , you can demo it next to your own go to.
+1 on all things Fabfilter! I use Pro L on every track. Pro Q and Saturn are also amazing.
bradymusicoParticipantWhy not just have a real life presence?
Sometimes I wonder if you are really just a 12 year old trying to pester everyone on this forum…C’mon man. Seriously!?
bradymusicoParticipantOf course it’s a joke…I got a good chuckle out of the demo reel.
-
AuthorPosts