woodsdenis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 438 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • woodsdenis
    Participant

    The samples contained on our products are licensed, not sold to you, the individual end user, by Big Fish Audio. This non-exclusive, non-transferable license is granted only to the individual end user who has purchased an unopened, new and lawfully made copy of this product from a dealer or distributor authorized by Big Fish Audio. All samples remain the property of Big Fish Audio and are licensed only for use in the creation of a recorded or live performance that includes the licensed samples as part of a derivative musical work created by the licensed end user. This license expressly forbids resale, rental, loan, gift or transfer of these samples in any format or via any medium, except as part of a derivative musical work. This license does not allow you to include the samples, whether unmodified or as part of a derivative work, in any music library or sample library product. However, a “special use” license may be requested from Big Fish Audio, free of charge, if you wish to use this product as part of a musical work intended for use with music libraries (some conditions apply, and Big Fish Audio retains the right to refuse any request that does not meet those conditions). Any unlicensed usage will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.

    Art, unless I am reading it wrong it looks like all samples require permission. They do sell other products on their website that are from other vendors.

    woodsdenis
    Participant

    If in doubt contact the company,they all have similar wording but the interpretation can be different.
    Eric Persing gave an example of Spectrasonics take on it. A cue on a movie score had a Stylus RMX drum loop in isolation for a part of it. This was OK as it was a part of an original work that just happened to feature that loop in it at a particular point.
    A Mercedes Ad featured a vocal sample from Symphony of Voices as the ident for the pack shot. Totally on its own and not part of a musical work, this required clearance and an extra license.

    Can get confusing.

    Big Fish do not allow any of there samples to be used in library music without clearance. Don’t buy, too much hassle. They have been burned in the past by “composers” just uploading the whole track as their own. They have whole tracks as loops etc in construction kits where you can reassemble the whole track, I have never really understood why anybody would use these, but there must be a market.

    in reply to: Best panning practices for library music? #11852
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    When writing directly for a production company I’ve always been coached to take advantage of panning and to keep the “interesting” stuff (melodic instruments, etc) out of the middle so as not to create competition with the dialog. The more room for dialog the louder the music can be mixed without interfering. I’ve also been told to be careful with loud drums and percussive elements due to the fact that when the music mix is turned down to make room for other elements (dialog, etc) nothing will be left of the mix but a faint snare beat. On certain shows both of these things can keep a track from getting used.

    Very good point, although I try to mix for most markets with or without v/o.
    http://www.mathewlane.com/DrMS.html

    I did come across this plug in which is in essence a very fancy M/S manipulator, in simple terms it separates the mid and side elements of a stereo mix and lets you do a lot to them. Could be used on a whole mix but great for synths,guitars, orchestral to get them subtly out of the centre and keep mono compatability.

    Although it adds depth and space to mixes it is not a stereo widener in the traditional sense which uses delays etc. Worth a look at IMHO.

    woodsdenis
    Participant

    You should have used Barrington Womble as a pseudonym LOL (a UK thing). Seriously, thanks for the info.

    in reply to: Logic Pro X #11822
    woodsdenis
    Participant
    in reply to: Logic Pro X #11789
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    I do think a third party 32 bit bridge for X is only a matter of time away.

    It exists already with jbridge I think.

    in reply to: Youtube Royalties? #11747
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    The comparison between Lady Gaga and most of the production music composers on this forum is beyond apples and oranges.

    The point I was making (badly) was that everyone sells for 99cents on iTunes. LOL

    However

    I do agree though with Mark, Art and MichaelL’s points on this. The handful of tracks I put on the AS labels have generated virtually no income and in fact one lost license would invalidate any earnings. It seemed a worthwhile idea at the time to see if it generated any further interest.

    Thankfully I am cautious by nature and any losses would be minimal, if any at all. You live and learn and it was a pre MLR decision !!!!

    As time goes on I have learned hopefully, what production is, and more importantly what it isn’t.

    Songwriters and bands who want their catalogue licensed are in different business to me. There is a crossover at times but rarely.

    It is important to note that none of my knowledge “real or imagined” would be possible without the contributions, discussions and info on this site. Seriously, kudos to Art for running a tight ship, and his everlasting tolerance.

    in reply to: Youtube Royalties? #11727
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    We currently have composers who are selling their music for $49.95 on our site and for much less than $0.99 on iTunes via AS compilation albums. I don’t like that at all but as they say here in Spain ‘es lo que hay’.

    The Audiosparx album tracks are sales not licenses are they not ?. Lady Gaga sells tracks for .99 cents on iTunes, am I missing something ?

    I have a few tracks on them from years ago, never saw the harm in it TBH.

    Doesn’t generate any income anyway, should take them off?

    in reply to: Zack Hemsey #11585
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    It’s not just insecurity Denis. A lot of it is resentment. Some composers, who feel deserving (perhaps because of their conservatory training) blame writers like Zimmer for moving the industry away from “old school” traditional orchestration. Times and tastes change, but they’ve got to blame someone.

    Too true, and that attitude to a lesser extent pervades in the library music business too.

    I remember distinctly as a young man, I went to music school. Whilst studying theory and orchestration the “rule” about consecutive fifths came up. Being a bit of a rebel I had a lengthy discussion with my very conservative teacher, stressing that the “Pink Panther” theme broke this rule and wouldn’t be the same without it. He had never heard of the Pink Panther or Henry Mancini. I left shortly afterwards and joined a rock band!!!!

    in reply to: Zack Hemsey #11580
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    regarding Zack Hemsey I don’t know who would be so daft to deride his work.

    Unfortunately success breeds contempt in very insecure people.There is a section of the film music community who see film music as high end orchestral composition . Some of it is no doubt, but they get into a frenzy when the see/hear anything break that mould, and even more so by someone who in their view has not had a “classical music” education.

    Hans Zimmer regularly gets derided and pummeled by the same types.

    in reply to: Zack Hemsey #11562
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    A very small world Art alright, MichaelL first alerted me to him a couple of years ago and while idling away on the net I came across this vid. It really goes to show that with talent and hard work you never know when the next break is comming.

    Also Zack help popularize that hi impact crossover sound. Everyone including myself thought that “Inception” trailer was Hans Zimmer at his best. Nice one.

    On a side note Art , you need to write “the book” with all the stories made public LOL

    in reply to: Youtube Royalties? #11439
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    Just recently a very well known Library exported all their cues, both exclusive and non exclusive to the Youtube id system. Incredible really that any library would be so ill-informed these days to do such a thing.

    It was only that Mark alerted me to it that I had any idea. They hadn’t even thought of informing their composers of this !!! I promptly emailed them and very quickly my cues, and according to them all other non ex too were withdrawn.

    in reply to: DP8 is here #11103
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    Did you sort out the initial problems Michael, I still have an upgrade from DP3 !!! I can use.

    in reply to: Logic Pro X #10991
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    FWIW, For me, Logic Pro 9.1.8 and ML have been no problem at all on my Macbook Pro. But with LPX, no 32 bit is a deal breaker. Maybe LPX.1 will save the day!

    Sorry I should have said ML threw up a lot of issues with other music software, Studio One, Live, and Protools especially. If you are on ML and use Logic 9 exclusively and ALL your plugs are 64 bit then its a no brainier really, BUT if not, I would hold on.

    in reply to: Logic Pro X #10987
    woodsdenis
    Participant

    Thanks for the heads up on that. Also you must have OS 10.8.4 ( Mountain Lion) to use it. I’ll stick to Logic 9 for the time being….

    I think the OS 10.8.4 must be a technical thing. I still use Lion as a lot of issues were kicked up with ML. Not a Logic user but have L9 and would have got L10 but for that.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 438 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us