Forum Replies Created
November 13, 2021 at 11:54 am in reply to: Comparing Companies that offer Music Library Websites for composers #39112
Art, thanks for the composerspace link.June 28, 2021 at 3:25 pm in reply to: Today’s State of the Exclusive vs Non-exclusive Debate #38201
I’ll be following this also since lately I lean more toward keeping control of ownership and copyright of my tracks.February 1, 2018 at 10:34 am in reply to: ascap site down? #29424
Working fine here.November 17, 2017 at 4:48 am in reply to: Good Article on Writing for Libraries #28871
Great read. Lots of good takeaways from it. I think the best advice is to submit what you believe in and do best, and that which is uniquely you. I can see how supervisors and libraries quickly get tired of hearing thousands of variations of the same thing.
Thanks for posting this, Michael!November 13, 2017 at 3:50 am in reply to: Tunesat question #28849
Thanks, Soundroad. If that’s the case, then their technology must be based on audio recognition after all.November 12, 2017 at 5:16 pm in reply to: Tunesat question #28847
To be safe, I deleted the mp3s and replaced the with the wav files. Thanks for the answers!November 12, 2017 at 6:59 am in reply to: Tunesat question #28842
Good to know, Art, thanks. Guess I’ll be deleting and replacing files this afternoon!October 25, 2017 at 5:47 am in reply to: Peak/Off-Peak in RF Libraries #28718
In that case, the songs I submitted should be going live in November. Perfect timing! 🙂October 15, 2017 at 4:47 pm in reply to: Spike TV payouts? #28650
Congratulations on the placements, David. Hope the payout is good!October 13, 2017 at 5:19 pm in reply to: Creating usable edits….. #28640
Now see, here I was today struggling to get an acceptable 15 second edit by editing and cutting, when I came upon this thread. Honestly, I don’t know why I never thought of just re-recording an altered snippet of the song for the edit. I did just that and I’m good to go with a nice sounding 15-second track! Granted, it was a single instrument (piano), so it was pretty easy.
Thank you, MLR 🙂October 11, 2017 at 6:55 pm in reply to: A Small Tunesat Success Story #28616
Well, looks like it’s unanimous! Thanks for the input, everyone.October 11, 2017 at 9:11 am in reply to: Copyright Violation, AdRev, YouTube Content ID #28596
My understanding is only the copyright owner can enter tracks into Content ID/AdRev, or assign an exclusive (single) representative to do so.
Ah ok, that makes sense. Thank you!October 11, 2017 at 9:09 am in reply to: first placement ever #28595
That’s great, congratulations!October 11, 2017 at 4:40 am in reply to: Copyright Violation, AdRev, YouTube Content ID #28585
So what happens when a non-exclusive track is in multiple non-exclusive libraries (RF or not), if all of those libraries are entering the track into AdRev? Doesn’t that lead to a multitude of problems?
Checked out their website, looks like the tracks can’t be registered with a PRO?