MichaelL

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,740 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Why Music Tracks Get Rejected #8545
    MichaelL
    Participant

    +1 Art.

    @Ron and Wildman, yes TJ’s work is remarkable, AND there are tons of composers who do amazing mock-ups…Mike Verta, Alex Temple, Alex Pfeffer, Mark Petrie…

    In another vein, Guy Bacos does great demos of the VSL library.

    http://guybacos.com/audio/Strolling%20Joyfully%20on%20a%20Snowy%20Day.mp3

    A good big band brass section used to be a weak link, but then came Sample Modeling…

    http://www.sample-modeling.com/Demos/Orchestral/Printemps_(Samplemodeling_BigBand).mp3

    If music lacks emotion, it is because the composer didn’t put it there, not because he/she used midi instruments. Moreover, the best use of midi involves performance not just programming and or cutting /pasting notes together. If emotion is missing, blame the performer (or non performer).

    If music is unconvincing, it is because the performer/producer/composer most likely doesn’t know how to write and/or orchestrate for real instruments in the first place, and thus cannot translate that knowledge into effective use of midi instruments.

    Too much evidence to the contrary and too much great work from so many talented composers using midi to support such a broad statement.

    _MichaelL

     

     

     

    in reply to: Royalties for online/streaming content #8543
    MichaelL
    Participant

    Under the heading of  “congratulations guys, you have royally screwed yourselves”…

    This subject was discussed at the PMA meeting that I attended in 2011. The “rate court” or entity that sets the going rate that the PROS must pay is looking at basing online streaming rates on what broadcasters pay in sync fees. Anybody spot the problem????

    Right…if you all participate in gratis licensing in the hope of getting backend money, there will eventually be little or no backend money, because there are no sync fees being paid. Performances will likely be similar to Spotify, Pandora or radio performances…pennies, not dollars, per play.

    By participating in gratis licensing you are killing the goose to some degree. If and/or when streaming will completely replace broadcast is up for debate.

    in reply to: How Was Your PRO Payment For January 2013? #8495
    MichaelL
    Participant

    Still waiting…… for 2nd Q 2012 and some of 1st Q 2012 from BMI. They’ve promised a catch-up payment before the next distribution. Switching from ASCAP to BMI is a PITA!!!!!!  But, will hopefully be worth it (in my situation).

    in reply to: Mastering Software. #8491
    MichaelL
    Participant

    Ozone is definitely not an “out-of-the box” plug. I don’t think you’ll get good results if you don’t have the opportunity to work with it for a while.  There are a number of good tutorials  on how to make the most of each component.

    So far, I’ve been happy with what Ozone does.  But this thread has my curious about alternatives. I’ll probably end up using a combination of tools. Always tweaking the toolkit.

    _MichaelL

    in reply to: Self Licensing via website for Royalty-free? #8480
    MichaelL
    Participant

    @ Mark, in addition to eventually working with ML/PIR, your package is something that I’d be interested in after we get settled in our new location, and start to roll out my catalog over the next 3 or 4 years. Please keep me posted.

    All the best,

    MichaelL

     

    in reply to: Etiquette when submitting to exclusives #8469
    MichaelL
    Participant

    Without the agressive tone of some of the posts I see here… When people talk about a-kissing, not bowing down, not being taken advantage of, etc, a red flag goes up for me as far as the professionalism of that composer. Too much attitude for my taste.

    +1…once again good, mature, advice from Advice.

    @ producer composer, I have known, dealt with, and met a lot of  library owners, particularly of the exclusive variety. They are all pretty much regular human beings, who have never been rude to me, or required any a-kissing or bowing down. To the contrary they have all been complete professionals who have shown interest in my work, and nothing but the respect that you seem to find lacking.

    Well written, well produced, functional music in the proper format, along with a professional attitude can open doors and move mountains. I am speaking of  exclusive libraries, that pay up front, where it is possible to develop relationships. In the cattle-call market of non-exclusives, where relationships are nearly non-existent, all bets are off.

    _MichaelL

     

     

     

     

     

    in reply to: Self Licensing via website for Royalty-free? #8459
    MichaelL
    Participant

    I give TV producers, that already I work with, my catalog on a hard drive. Sometimes they call with a special request from my catalog, that may not be on the hard drive. which I send immediately via yousendit.(or something similar)

    If you’re talking about non-broadcast local producers that you already work with, try to set up a “subscription” agreement. You could give them your catalog on a hard drive, or host it in a download situation.

    in reply to: Hope For Primarily Electronic Composers? #8410
    MichaelL
    Participant

    I spend a lot of time(purely for research purposes !!!) in a pub in London

    😆 the other Michael.

    Cheers

    MichaelL

    in reply to: Hope For Primarily Electronic Composers? #8409
    MichaelL
    Participant

    I’m curious about the next big thing already. Now that things got rather tonal than melodic and the tempo dropped so drastically, what could the next step be? =)

    @ Ulla…I’m going with bagpipe dubstep….calling it  kiltex or tartanex.

    in reply to: Other revenue "streams"…. #8395
    MichaelL
    Participant

    I’m on Pandora…saving up to buy a cup of coffee!  LOL!

    in reply to: Any licensed music that caught your ear? #8387
    MichaelL
    Participant

    @Mark….yes, great track. Here’s the full video, with a bit more development.

    Love the sound design. Greta FX and subtle synth on the chase “rabbit.”

    http://www.vevo.com/watch/swedish-house-mafia/greyhound/GB1201200034

    And from my bartender days……a greyhound is vodka and grapefruit juice. 😉

     

    in reply to: Any licensed music that caught your ear? #8386
    MichaelL
    Participant

    Good to follow the trends,  so I`m off to make some dubstep ukulelesongs

    😆 …..EPIC dubstep ukelele songs!

    in reply to: No cue sheet file, is it piracy? #8377
    MichaelL
    Participant

    FUSE TV is notorious for not filing cue sheets. I HATE IT. I am c constantly hearing my songs on thier program. Anybody else going through this?

    In another thread you asked about cue sheets for The Guy Code (I think).

    Sorry to say Bigg, you’re talking about programming for a generation that thinks file sharing isn’t stealing. Good luck getting cue sheet respect.

    in reply to: Any licensed music that caught your ear? #8375
    MichaelL
    Participant

    @AB…I’m not so offended by Barbie’s post , with the exception that I wouldn’t want to be the composer. There’s probably a few dozen desperate writers pouring through their hard drives right now looking for ukelele samples to do similar cues.

    in reply to: Any licensed music that caught your ear? #8368
    MichaelL
    Participant

    About 15 years ago Somewhere Over the Rainbow, recorded by the late Israel Kamakawiwo’ole…was a licensing home-run …in Meet Joe Black and a bunch of commercials. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_DKWlrA24k   Arguably it started the whole light-hearted ukelele thing in ads and trailers.

    Philip Phillips has recently had a lot of licensing success with Home. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoRkntoHkIE

     

     

     

Viewing 15 posts - 1,561 through 1,575 (of 1,740 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us