Michael Nickolas

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 523 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ASCAP and their inadequate survey system #28593
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    ASCAP email says that youtube settlement payment is the first of two. Should be another one paid in the March/April 2018 distributions.

    in reply to: Largest single-use PRO amount you've seen? #28592
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    What’s listed in the C/S category of the statement for those?

    in reply to: Copyright Violation, AdRev, YouTube Content ID #28591
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    So what happens when a non-exclusive track is in multiple non-exclusive libraries (RF or not), if all of those libraries are entering the track into AdRev?

    My understanding is only the copyright owner can enter tracks into Content ID/AdRev, or assign an exclusive (single) representative to do so.

    in reply to: Technical Aspects Of Collabs #28590
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Most libraries want the co-writer to sign the agreement, including non-ex like Crucial. In RF it usually doesn’t matter, just make sure to distribute sales income according to your agreed upon split.

    You should sign a co-writing agreement with your friend that spells out exactly the terms of your collaboration.

    If I write a hot instrument bed and he thinks of a vocal hook, did he in fact co-write the piece?

    Before the Pharrell Williams court decision, I always understood a copyright is made up of lyrics and melody. So yes he did co-write, if not entirely write the piece, as far as copyright goes.

    in reply to: first placement ever #28589
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Congrats! It would be fun to watch your first placement live, it puts a smile on your face to know that millions of people are hearing your creation. I remember sitting through soap opera episodes to hear my first placements. It was an hour of torture for a minute of satisfaction. 🙂

    in reply to: ASCAP and their inadequate survey system #28564
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    FWIW- the archaic survey system finally worked in my favor for a change, based on today’s domestic statement…

    in reply to: Feedback welcome – song is Gather Round #28492
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    So my supplement to library income is as a freelance songwriter for Macmillan Educational Publishing. I’ve written hundreds of children’s songs used in dozens of their courses designed to teach English as a second language.

    Yours has the happy vibe needed for the genre. I think a lot of the track is MIDI instruments? Over the years I’ve purchased a kids toy accordion, harmonicas, kazoo, a banjo, recorders and all kinds of percussion. Don’t be afraid to set up a microphone and record these instruments live. It can really add another dimension.

    in reply to: Learning saxophone…. #28471
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Actually, the tracks I were thinking about are available on Pond5 now.

    https://www.pond5.com/collections/2061952

    Most have horn sections, the ones that demonstrate using loops to build a solo are:

    If You Riff – sax solo at 1:00
    Onward Motion – trumpet solo at 1:29
    True Groove – sax solo at 1:53
    The Night Growl – sax solo at 1:23

    If you don’t listen too closely, I think they’re passable.

    in reply to: The Production Music Awards #28457
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    And the award for best corporate ukulele cue (with human whistling) goes to…just kidding, nice to have an organization spotlighting the industry 🙂

    in reply to: Nuraphones – Bust Or Gamechanger? #28456
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Good question, bust or gamechanger? Given a quick at their site, I didn’t see a mention of a double blind study, which could help convince which one it is….

    in reply to: Learning saxophone…. #28455
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    I personally don’t have the patience to coax a realistic performance out of a VST so I say learn the sax! That is if you think you’ll be using it a lot, given the cost of a sax and the time investment. For the occasional sax parts I either bring in a sax player to my studio, use a sax player with the ability to record remotely and send me the parts, or use loops. You can get a very convincing solo using loops. I’ll send you an example if you’d like. Don’t want to post it here as it’s not watermarked.

    in reply to: What is your favorite placement so far? #28359
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    No sync fee, no royalty yet (BMI). Very interesting, what National Geographic payment rate?

    The largest amount for a single play on NGC from my last statement was $3.02 for 44 seconds.

    in reply to: Pay to submit libraries #28157
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Pay to play can definitely be a scam, buyer beware. But, I have to admit I’ve used it cautiously, and in one instance was rewarded quite nicely for my effort. I suppose if I didn’t have that success I’d be blasting the business model. But now, I’m leaning towards saying do your research and be smart about it.

    in reply to: Is there a way to check what your new cue sheets are in ASCAP? #28246
    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    No way to tell that I’ve found. There should be some sorting features (like sort by newest) but there isn’t.

    Michael Nickolas
    Participant

    Thanks for sharing your honest thoughts and experiences in these times

    I think this was meant for the Irma topic, but I agree. Hope the cleanup won’t be too much of a hassle for you guys!

    A deal has been made between ASCAP and Google, but it would be nice if we knew what was inside this deal below?

    http://www.tubefilter.com/2017/06/13/youtube-ascap-data-sharing-deal/

    Glancing at this one, it seems any increase in payment is tied to the Content ID system, which many of us here don’t utilize in order to work with RF libraries hassle free.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 523 total)
X

Forgot Password?

Join Us