Home » 1 To ... » 615 Music

615 Music

Rating: 6.5/10. From 4 votes.
Please wait...
x
Bookmark

If you are a composer and/or songwriter, please leave your comments and experiences with 615 Music. We want to hear the good as well as the bad! Please rate, from 1 to 10, by clicking on one of the stars. Below is some general information but we make no guarantee of accuracy. Check with 615 Music for all details. Please contact us for any corrections.

 

URL: https://www.warnerchappellpm.com/collection/615-platinum-series/
Twitter:
Facebook:
Accepting Submissions: Yes
Submit Online: No
Submit By Mail: Yes
Submissions Reviewed: Yes
Types Accepted:
  • Vocals
  • Instrumentals
Charge For Submissions: No
Up Front Money:
Royalty Free:
(non-broadcast use)
No
Exclusivity:
(Exclusive, Non, Semi)

(Semi = Free to place on own
but not with another library)
Exclusive
Re-Title: Yes
Set Own Price: No
Contract Length: 3 Years
Payment Schedule: Quarterly
License Fee Split:
(writer/library)
50/50
PRO Split Based on 100%:
(writer/library
writer/library/publisher
or writer)
50/50
Requires Licensee To File Cue Sheet: Yes
Pays On Blanket License:
YouTube Content ID:
Active Site: Yes
Offers Subscriptions To Clients:
Notes:

Now part of Warner Bros. Production Music.

30 thoughts on “615 Music”

    • Not from what I read. You have to go to 615 Song Catalog to create an account and upload. 615 Music is mail only. I just listed 615 Song Catalog.

      Reply
      • 615 Music is EXCLUSIVE
        Contract Length: Indefinite (work for hire)
        Payment Schedule: PRO Money Only
        License Fee Split: 0/100
        PRO Split Based on 100%: 50/50

        What you have listed now is for 615 Song Catalog and it is completely different deal.

        Reply
  1. Hi Mark
    My take would be if they make a point of recommending against it, then don’t put tracks in their library and others. If they end up encountering a conflict, it certainly won’t enhance your relationship with them.

    I called or emailed them once about submissions and they did emphasize that they don’t want to compete with other libraries for the same tracks. So whether it’s written into the contract or just their guidelines, I say if you work with them honor their wishes.

    NW

    Reply
  2. Just to reiterate what was said earlier. They are non-exclusive but they are exclusive as far as other libraries. You can sign songs with them and still pitch for artists, etc but not to other libraries. This may not be clear on their website, I don’t recall.

    Reply
  3. I contacted them once, but never got around to submitting. The did answer my email promptly and give info about submissions. I asked if their deal was exclusive- it is with respect to other music libraries. You can still pitch songs for artists and other applications but they don’t want to compete with other libraries on your tracks. They are not the only library that has this policy and there are understandable reasons for it. A big concern out there is the same track landing on a music supervisor’s desk from multiple sources. It can cause problems and bidding wars.

    As much as most of us don’t like exclusives, often the most successful libraries are. Their clients like knowing that they truly are the only representative of the tracks presented and there will be no conflicts.

    Exclusive only as far as other libraries is a decent compromise. In fact, there is a valid school of thought that one shouldn’t put the same tracks in multiple non-exclusive libraries anyway, if they serve similar markets.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

X

Forgot Password?

Join Us